One Born Every Minute

Last night, for the first time in very, very long time, I sat and watched 'OBEM'.  It wasn't a concious choice - we had watched the great classic movie 'Stand by Me' (oh River Phoenix, what a loss) as a family, and when the DVD had finished the TV returned to OBEM just as it started.  And I was hooked; mesmerized; drawn-in and unable to move despite my intentions to get to bed as I am feeling quite unwell of late.  But there I was, one hour later, as the credits rolled.

There are lots of reasons I don't watch programmes such as this one; firstly, my family don't allow it.  They feel it's detrimental to my health as I am unable to watch without large amounts of steam coming from my ears.  Secondly, it reminds me of the fact that the way I practise as a midwife is at risk, and frankly the thought of returning to work in a large, consultant unit, fills me with dread and fear.

So what was wrong with last night's programme?  Let's start with the fact that both labours, both healthy, first time mothers, both considered 'low risk' (hate that phrase), ended with unnecessary intervention:

'Mother one' was already in early labour; as she was 12 days over, she requested to have her labour 'induced' and just get on with it.  "Good news", hails the midwife, "we can break your waters and get you going."  A birth that was starting physiologically is now having a helping hand with an intervention that brings it's own risks (which I did not see being discussed), or other options given (such as go home - you shouldn't be anywhere near a labour ward at present) and is presented to an audience of viewers as the norm (which it probably is on a consultant unit).  Mother one did give birth vaginally - on her back, epidural in-situ and an episiotomy.

'Mother two' arrives in spontaneous labour, but she stalls and after a few hours it is decided her labour must be accelerated.  And when I say decided, this was the conversation:
Midwife "You've been stuck at 4-5cms for a while, so I need to talk to the doctors to decide what to do"........  "The plan is the get you going and put a drip up to get some oomph behind those contractions".  Interesting use of language, a really great way of not demonstrating informed CHOICE and decision making - the mother was not even included in that, the midwife and doctor decided - and another birth that needed a 'helping hand'.  It was however really fantastic to see the mother using an 'alternative position' and standing as she birthed her baby.

After watching the programme I am now aware of several things: Midwives are in charge and know best; women are clearly malfunctioning when it comes to labour; physiological birth doesn't work.  I am so grateful to have had those points clarified and to recognise that it must be time to change my practice as I am very outdated in my beliefs that birth is normal; that labour has it's own rhythm; that women should be involved in all aspects of the decision making; that the amniotic sac provides a safe, protective barrier in labour; that vagina's are designed to stretch to birth a baby; that facilitating a safe, warm, quiet, environment aids progress in labour.  Thank you to the powers that be (insurance companies and eu regulations) that foolish midwives like myself, or like Virginia Howes need to be tamed and brought into line and that we are wrong.

I clearly am one of those 'born every minute' that needs to be reminded on prime-time TV that birth does not work and the NHS knows best.

angela x

Home Birth is for Hippies?

This was an original article I wrote a few years ago and felt it was relevant again.....

“I’m planning a Home Birth”. It amazes me that this simple, short statement can evoke such a torrent of emotion and be an area where people feel they have the right to comment on someone else’s choices; the phrase ‘you’re so brave’ springs to mind here. Yet without doubt, the discussions and thoughts around home birth bring to mind many powerful images, not least of ‘danger and emergency’, but for some, the image that the ‘sort of woman’ who may choose home birth, as being a slightly alternative, incense burning, ‘hippie’.

Home birth is not a new concept; home, since the time of (wo)man, has been the place where women birthed their babies. In the beginning, home was most likely to have been a sheltered cave, nestled on a hill-side somewhere, and over time has developed into the style of housing that we now know in the western world. Hospital as a place of birth however, is a fairly recent development in the time line of history and yet it has been culturally accepted as the safe place to give birth, even though study after study, report after report does not uphold this notion. Now, don’t get me wrong here; the advent of technology, obstetrics and the caesarean birth have played a hugely important role in making birth safe for both mother and baby – and we now experience very low rates of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. However, it is not exclusively through birth taking place in hospital that has lowered these rates so significantly, but the development of excellent antenatal care, drugs for the prevention of haemorrhage and infection, and the development of health professionals’ skills in recognising and managing emergency situations.

In an article in ‘The Times’ newspaper (May 09), journalist Melanie Reid launched a scathing attack on women who had or were planning home births: she labelled them as spoilt and complacent, insinuating that intelligent women choose hospital birth, and only ‘sandal-wearing' women (the hippie word again?) would choose home birth.

True? – far from it;

Factual? – indeed not;

Emotive? – yes and yes again.

Ms Reid is not alone however in voicing her opinion, and this is part of the problem for women who are considering home birth – the emotion that decision causes, the myths around home birth and the presumption of ‘safety’ deter many women from pursuing, what is in fact, a very normal, very safe choice.

I had my third baby at home; it was a well-researched, informed, intelligent decision. I met some opposition along the way, but on the whole felt well supported and confident in this decision. No, it was not my ‘first baby’, but how I wish it had been! I had never truly considered home birth an option, after all I did not know anyone who had given birth at home. I had been born in hospital and I was not a sandal-wearing hippie. Why on earth would I want a home birth? Well after experiencing two less than positive hospital births, I felt instinctively that there had to be another way. And there was, and it was fantastic – hard work – but empowering, positive, and ‘uniquely normal’.

The home birth rate in the UK is around 2%, but in parts of the UK the home birth rate is a staggering 50%! In areas where the home birth rate exceeds the average, there are some telling trends in the way maternity care is delivered: midwives actively offer home birth throughout pregnancy and discuss it in an open, friendly manner; women share positive stories of their home birth experiences - giving other women confidence in their own ability to give birth; and women are attended at home, in labour, by a midwife (they often know) and make the final decision on the big day itself! This gives them the freedom to see how they are feeling and coping, knowing that they will be well supported by the midwife, by family and birth supporters, whatever their decision. I would challenge anyone to categorise all those women as hippies.

The DoH has aims to increase the home birth rates for women to experience real choice within maternity services; of course this is still to be delivered and is an ongoing issue for most women.   Following the inception of the NHS it took national campaigns to persuade women to give birth in hospital, needing continual reassurances of cleanliness (hospitals were previously associated with mortality due to infection – very different from now?), and the influential offer of 10 days rest and food. The stark reality in the UK at present is that hospital birth no longer comes with the benefit of complete rest – women are encouraged to leave as quickly as possible due to the high demand for beds (at home you get your own bed); NHS trusts are stretched to capacity with midwife shortages on the labour ward (at home you get your own midwife); and the caesarean section rate is spiralling out of control (planning a home birth halves the chance of you needing a caesarean section).

Hospital is the perfect place for giving birth for the woman who may need additional obstetric care, who may need paediatric care for her new baby or who may not have the support in place to have her baby at home – and no one ever seems to feel the need to comment on those decisions. Next time someone says to you “I’m planning a home birth”, take a closer look; I expect you will find a normal woman, making a normal choice, planning to have a normal birth in the perfect place for her. And not a ‘hippie’ in sight!

Looking to the future

2013 and the start of another year: I love the New Year; of feeling positive for the future, of letting go of the past, of seeking new goals and possibilities.

This time 14 years ago I was expecting my first baby..... and I was waiting for my first baby who was still to put in an appearance after my due date had been and gone!  I would still be waiting for another 6 days and my experience of midwifery care and birth was 'normal', but not great.  It took another two babies to understand that birth can be the single most transformational moment in a person's life, and during that powerful home birth, a midwife was also born, one who wanted to share the 'secret' with other women.  Roll on 9 years from that birth and here I am.........

In 2012 I cared for 10 birthing women and their families;  3 first time mothers (all normal births, 1 breech, 2 in hospital), 2 VBACS (1 a HWB, 1 ended in caesarean), 4 multips all having home water births and a water birth in the local birth centre on an NHS bank shift.  It was a privilege to care for these families and to support them through their inspiring births; the lack of alcohol is a pain and I wrote before about how up and down midwifery can feel, but it still never ceases to amaze me.  I'm not sure it ever will.

This year will be a testing year for Independent Midwives as we try to find a way forward with the looming PII issue and the EU laws preventing our practise from October 2013.  I have a busy case-load for the first half of this year, but feel confident and full of optimism that a solution will be found somehow, and I will be able to continue with my midwifery journey as I would like to in the second half of the year.   I also have plans to finish my book, to continue to work with aspiring midwives, to work to ensure IM's exist next year, and somewhere in between fit in my home-schooling family.  It won't be easy, but then 2012 challenged me in more ways than I ever felt possible, and I got through that! Just as in birth, sometimes it is harder than expected; transition can be frightening and overwhelming, but the hard work is worth it as you push your baby into the world.  This year I am looking forward to the birth of a new era in Midwifery and facing those challenges with the same excitement, hopes and fears as any new mother; I have a feeling it will be a year to remember.

angela xx

Even a future Queen to be is still ‘just’ a Mother to Be.

The exciting news was announced that The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting their first baby; whilst the Duchess recovered from Hyperemesis Gravidarum (a debilitating acute from of morning sickness) and amidst all the excitement and media hype, was the devastating outcome of the ‘prank call’ and the everlasting ripples from the fall-out:  not the most positive start to a pregnancy for any couple, yet alone a couple who are prominently held in the public eye.

So what next for the Royal Couple? Well, just like any other new parents-to-be, before any of the screening, bloods, ultrasound, place of birth, type of birth choices they make, they might like to consider who they invite to care for them; they may choose to have their care with a private obstetrician, or they may choose to use their local NHS system, or they may seek a known midwife to support them in their pregnancy; but they do have a choice over all of these.   Essentially, having someone to talk to might make negotiating all those choices a little easier!

If I was Kate’s midwife (as her midwife, I would call her Kate, and she may call me Angela), I would spend time with her talking through her options; in-between appointments (that would be in her own home, and at convenient times, with appointment times that William could also come to) I would encourage her to read widely; some books I might suggest to her would include ‘Ina May's Guide to Childbirth’, Childbirth without Fear: The Principles and Practice of Natural Childbirth ’ and ‘What Every Parent Needs to Know: The incredible effects of love, nurture and play on your child's development’, as well as giving her up to date information on nutrition, screening and normal pregnancy ailments.   (I did google pregnancy books for Royalty, but it just found the Royal Free in Hampshire!)  We would drink tea together, share concerns, and build a trusting relationship, and she would feel secure in knowing that she would be well supported in her choices, and that on the big-day, someone she knew would be at her side when her baby was born.

This type of midwifery care enables women to really make choices; we also know that they are more likely to have a normal healthy pregnancy, a  normal straightforward birth, more likely to establish breastfeeding, and less likely to experience postnatal depression.   Pretty compelling reasons as to why one-to-one midwifery care is so important, and why it is essential that women know that this is the care they should receive as the norm, that they should be shouting loudly for, and that shouldn’t only be open to those whose NHS trust is forward thinking, or those who can engage an Independent Midwife like myself, and whose way of working is under threat.

The hype around the beginning of The Duke and Duchess’s pregnancy will hopefully settle and they will be able to look forward to the next 8 months or so (albeit it being very much the talk of the nation).   Expecting a baby, is for most people, a joyful, exciting event;  but every woman, whether it’s her first, second or subsequent baby, may still have the same anxieties, the same pregnancy complaints’ and may have to make some of the same choices that other mothers will – even if she is a future Queen!  

Placenta Possibilites

Smoothie anyone?

This morning I made myself my usual smoothie; rice milk (300mls), a banana and a handful of frozen blueberries.  As the blender whizzed my power drink, I was reminded of the workshop I attended last week on Placenta Remedies, facilitated by Lynnea Shrief from IPEN and organised by midwifery on-line.

I recently blogged on the third stage of labour, and felt it was time to update my knowledge on the choices that women have regarding their placentas; Placenta Encapsulation is something I have heard of, know vaguely about and have read briefly around, but I did not feel I had enough information to really talk to women about consuming their placenta and the perceived benefits of this.  I also felt I had to get over my own queasiness over the idea of eating what is often viewed as a waste product.

The workshop was really interesting; doulas, student midwives and aspiring midwives made up the group of interested women - I was the only midwife on this day, although Lynnea confirmed that midwives often attend the study day.  The morning looked at why women choose to consume their placenta, testimonials from women on the benefits and an exploration of mammals normal instinct to consume the placenta (and the really cool fact that the only land mammals who don't consume their placenta is the Camel!).  Testimonials from women included:

• increase in milk production
• reduced postnatal bleeding
• faster recovery
• more energy
• less depression

These all make sense when you consider that the placenta is a power-house of hormones and an iron-rich food source that has nourished and grown a baby for 9 months.  Lynnea was clear that there is not huge scientific evidence to support placenta consumption, but as she rightly pointed out, there is no money to be earned from women eating their own products so no-one will be putting funding towards an RCT on this area!

Later on in the day we learnt about safe storage of placentas, infection control and reduction, and then had a 'hands-on 'session making placenta tinctures and essences...... and Smoothies.  We made a 'berry placenta smoothie' which looked just like my breakfast this morning.  Apparently it tastes good too! (Placenta Encapsulation is studied at a separate workshop).

As a midwife, I feel much more informed to offer this choice to client, and more importantly, I am convinced that a smoothie would benefit my clients significantly.  Of course, women need to be open to this choice, and within our culture where eating offal is considered 'yukky', this might prove a challenge!  I am however, looking forward to sharing, exploring and learning more about this with the women I care for, and to writing about this further and would be interested to hear your comments on placenta consumption.

angela x

Shhh..... I practise physiological third stage

The third stage of labour feels like a topic that is discussed in secret amongst student midwives and midwives; whispered 'what do you do?' questions and the caginess around what one actually 'does' is tangible.

Practice around third stage came up in a recent conversation I was having, and I felt it was time this subject was explored, caginess put aside, and clarity about the NORMALness of a physiological third stage heralded high and loud.

As a student midwife, I was clear about the skills I wanted to learn; I was also very fortunate to have a mentor who was skilled in facilitating physiological birth, and another mentor whose trust in me enabled us to learn together about the third stage.  I was, however, unique in being one of only a handful of students who qualified having gained this knowledge and developed this skill: most only knew how to 'manage' the delivery of the placenta.  I know this is still happening and frankly I find it worrying.

It is normal within the hospital setting for managed third stage to occur; a reason cited to me is that it takes 'too long' to wait for the placenta.

Q1. How long does a physiological third stage take? 

20 minutes is about average, maybe 30, very rarely an hour or more.  If you assume it will take around 20 minutes, even in a busy unit, this should still be the time that the mother and baby are bonding and shouldn't be 'hassled'.  Plenty of time therefore for the midwife to be quietly and attentively watching.

 Q2.  What about the risk of haemorrhage?

Firstly, in a physiological birth, the risk of haemorrhage is relatively low  (I could reference this, but am choosing to use innate midwifery knowledge here).  The clue in this statement is physiological birth, i.e. spontaneous onset, contractions regular and rhythmic, no pharmacological pain relief (okay, a little gas and air is fine), spontaneous explusive urges, no interference with the mother-baby dyad.  In other words, with absolutely no intervention - just a mother working with her body, oxytocin flowing, adrenalin reduced, trust and patience high. 

Okay, so it doesn't take as long as you might have thought, and mum might not bleed to death, but what about the shift leader who is knocking on the door asking if the placenta is out?  What about the assumption from the woman that she will have the injection?  If the shift leader is knocking, it is our job as midwives to politely, but firmly inform them that we will let them know if we have any concerns, we will update them as and when is appropriate, but will not accept people knocking on the door (you could point out that this is like trying to have a pooh with people hanging around outside, and maybe they would not be comfortable with that?).  Midwifery is an autonomous profession, you have a duty of care to the woman, not the shift leader.

Q3. What about informed choice?

It is currently bang on trend for women to choose 'delayed cord clamping'; therefore half the work is done for you.  You know the benefits of a physiological third stage - if you have supported her in a physiological birth, surely you are just continuing with that?  I'm going to put my neck out here and say why does she need to make a choice?  That would mean you are questioning her body, and getting her thinking brain to respond.  Remember, at this point its all about the oxytocin - and quiet, watchful waiting.

 In The Midwife's Labour and Birth Handbook there is a very good chapter on third stage and a clear explanation of what a midwife 'should' and 'shouldn't' be doing; Elizabeth Davis also offers a clear summary in her beautiful Heart and Hands: A Midwife's Guide to Pregnancy and Birth book (definitely recommend that one).

Q4. What do you do?

I myself have learnt FIVE key skills to supporting a physiological third stage :

1. Keep the woman warm after birth: if she is cold, it affects the physiology of the placental separation

2. Keep the room quiet: too much excitement raises adrenaline and impacts on uterine contractions

3.  Watch carefully and listen fully: you will see the tell-tale trickle of separation and mum normally notices stomach pains

4.  Use gravity to aid delivery: the mother will normally push the placena out herself.  However, toilets are magical here; help the mother to the loo, she will pee and pass the placenta all at once.  Never fails if time is passing! 

5. Do not Fear it - IT WORKS!

“Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood. “~Marie Curie

What thoughts do you have to share around the third stage?

angela xx

but that's just silly!......

Last week, and with my home-educating mummy hat on, I ran a 'morning with a midwife' workshop.  12 bright eyed children aged between 9 and 15 arrived at my home for a two-hour interactive workshop.

We started of by covering the role of the midwife, and what kind if checks we do; they played with my sonic aid and listened to each others hear rate; they guessed if one of the mum's BP would be high or low, and they giggled as they 'explored' their own pelvis - finding their coccyx and poking around their bottoms!

Children are brilliant (well mostly brilliant, unless they are annoying or I am having a bad day), but on the whole brilliant.  They see things so clearly, and haven't been dis-illusioned by adult-hood, and are still naturally thinking out-side the box - this, I am delighted to say, made teaching them great fun.

After they had labelled up some large pregnancy charts, we looked at the physiology of how the cervix opens, how the baby descends through the vagina and how the baby rotates and fits (perfectly) through the pelvis.  Having tired of the poor messages passed to children (and adults) about birth, I used positive language: I talked about the intensity of birth, and how women cope really well with this and can rest between surges, I talked about how the baby is squeezed and 'cuddled' by the uterus with every surge, I talked about how the baby is pushed out and it feels like a huge urge to pooh!  They got it, and accepted it, and asked about it, and then there was this Eureka! moment: to help the children visualise the size and weight of a growing baby, I had created a basket with different items weighing approx weights at different gestation.  I had an orange for 20 weeks (200gms) and so forth, with the final weight of the basket about 3200g (7 1/2 pounds ish in old money).  Using the pelvis, I showed how easy it was for the orange to get through when the 'mummy' was kneeling or on all fours, then I turned the pelvis into semi-recumbent and......... the Orange just sat there.  Eureka!  

..."but that is just silly!  why would you do that?!....."

asked a 9 year old.  Why would you do that?  Why would a woman give birth in the most physiologically challenging position you could choose? Why would a woman shut her pelvis and work against gravity?  Why would we do something so silly?  Well if a 9 year old can get that, then why are the vast majority of women giving birth on their backs?  Why are student midwives qualifying having NOT supported women in 'alternative' (don't get me started on that phrase) positions? Why why why? 

One for Mr Marr!

I feel there are many reasons (sadly) why this continues; the medical mode of birth, the use of pharmacological pain relief, ease for the midwife, the images of birth that are portrayed in the media?  None of these of course make it OK, or acceptable, but I do think the latter is a huge influencing factor. It's almost as if women expect to birth in that position - the children did, as that is what they have seen - until shown otherwise.  So perhaps then, it is the Film and TV producers of the world we should be talking to?  Certainly, in the opening issue of Andrew Marrs' History of the World (a brilliant programme I might add) the ancient African homosapien is seen to birth in the 'typical' semi-recumbent position.  Historically, women birthed upright; using trees, kneeling, squatting to give birth; not sitting with their bums and vagina's in the dirt.  It would have been much cooler Mr Marrs if your production team had shown that!

Perhaps it's time to remind ourselves of the Wonderful Female Pelvis, to remind women, doctors, parents, teachers, children, and the Film Industry of how perfectly designed we are to birth and how women - when well supported - will adopt the 'alternatively brilliant' birth positions that aid birth naturally.  Perhaps it's time for a new slogan:

'don't take it lying down!'..... 'knees for ease!......'using the (all) fours of gravity!......  suggestions please!

and here is a little something to share: (catch it here too http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MswFqXdOq2U)

Enjoy!

angela xx